[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: xpath vs xql

• From: Richard Lanyon <rgl@d...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 09:24:02 +0100 (BST)

On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Joshua Allen wrote:

> Most companies commony use SQL syntax with joins, WHERE IN ()
> criteria and so on that are fairly natural in SQL but difficult
> in xslt/xpath.  By the same token, there are tons of things
> that are very natural to represent as XSLT that would be impossible
> or at least very bizzare to represent as SQL.

Though, having said that, the way you represent the data is different
in a relational database from the way you'd represent it in an XML
document.

I'd suspect that the semantic nature of the queries people
make will be similar, but in databases it will be represented in a
manner that is easy to retrieve using SQL, while in XML documents it
will be represented in a manner that is easy to retrieve using XPath.

-- 
Richard Lanyon (Software Engineer) |     "The medium is the message"
XML Script development,            |             - Marshall McLuhan
DecisionSoft Ltd.                  |


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: xpath vs xql
    • From: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@S...>

• References:
  • RE: xpath vs xql
    • From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Various presentations
• Next by Date: Re: Various presentations, schema concepts, etc.
• Previous by thread: RE: xpath vs xql
• Next by thread: RE: xpath vs xql
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread