[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Namespace for a collection of related schemas? : related to LC-117
Roger Costello wrote: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Question 3. > > > > Consider a respository of namespaces (and the elements > associated with > > the namespaces). For managing things it might be easier to have one > > namespace for the collection than separate namespaces. Any > > thoughts on > > this? > > > This is the type of scenario that motivated my comment (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2000AprJun/0159.html) that became LC-117 on the last call issues. In addition, by having the document specify individual resources for each namespace, there is no mechanism for a schema designer to enforce that any expectations about the elements that he has specifically included from other namespaces which basically makes the uri on the import a joke. *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|