[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
Rick JELLIFFE wrote: > This would keep a basic XML implementation that did not support "character > validity" simple: > 1) it can use any library for transcoding > 2) it does not have to have any special BOM handling for utf16xe > 3) it can tokenize tags based on whitespace and delimiters rather than > NAMECHAR or NAMESTRT > 4) normalization not checked/enforced This goes well beyond the goals of XML 1.0 2nd ed, which is not meant to change radical things like your #3. It is simply a republication with the errata incorporated of XML 1.0. -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer) *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|