[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Document Feature Requirements [was: Common XML ...]
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Simon St.Laurent wrote: > At 01:09 AM 4/8/00 -0400, Steven Rowe wrote: > >Is it not ironic that Common XML, an attempt to increase interoperability, > >excludes PIs, which are likely to be the mechanism which will be proposed > >to express document feature requirements, another attempt to increase > >interoperability. > > It would be ironic, except that Common XML doesn't exclude PIs. It just > keeps them out of the core set of safely interoperable features. Please forgive my ignorance; Common XML *Core* excludes PIs. It appears that you've intentionally left the boundary between XML and Common XML fuzzy, if not altogether invisible. Of course Common XML doesn't exclude anything in XML. It *is* XML. If CXML is intended to partition XML features, the naming scheme needs work. Steve Rowe MNIS-TextWise Labs *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|