[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)

• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• To: "David Megginson" <david@m...>
• Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 14:42:31 -0400

Hi David,

> Didier replies:
> So, if I understand well, these parser automatically turn on the
validation
> process when a DOCTYPE is encountered in the file. You have to manually
turn
> off validation with an command line option. Is that right? I'll enter that
> info in my notebook.

David said:
Wrong.  Non-validating processors can also include the external DTD
subset (it's optional for them, not forbidden).

Didier replies:
Is this because a DTD can contain external entities declarations and because
of this fact, the parser has to read the DTD to resolve these external
entities?

So, to be more precise, can we say that the DTD can be considered part of
the document, expecially if the DTD may contains external entities
declarations.

As Steve pointed that out, if the standalone="yes" attribute/value is
included in the xml declaration, then what the parser does if external
entities are present in the XML document and that these external entities
are declared in the DTD? Are these external entities unresolved?

Cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@n...
Conferences: XML Europe (http://www.gca.org)
Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com)
column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com)
Products: http://www.netfolder.com


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Parser Behaviour (serious)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Next by Date: Re: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Previous by thread: Re: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Next by thread: RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread