[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Generic Notions behind Transformations?

• From: Philip Allen <plega@d...>
• To: XML-DEV <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 18:30:25 +0100

David Wang wrote:

> some generic way to describe in XML some ideas such as:
> 
> 1) concatentation/substring for strings (including reordering 
>    of strings)
> 2) "simple" mathematical abstractions for numbers (literals) 
>    and variables
 
You might want to try XML Script (www.xmlscript.org).  It does all of
the above, being designed primarily for generic transformations
(although it's light on the more advanced mathematical operators). 
There is a downloadable processor available on site (currently
Linux/Win32), free for non-commercial use.

Philip Allen

DecisionSoft Limited           Mobile:  +44-7956-160959
www.decisionsoft.com           Office:  +44-1865-203192
                               Fax:     +44-1865-203194
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
X-Stream XML transcoding technology - www.xmlscript.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Generic Notions behind Transformations?
    • From: David Wang <dwang@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: List server: another timing test (results and questions)
• Next by Date: XML: "turning into the modern-day Tower of Babel"
• Previous by thread: Generic Notions behind Transformations?
• Next by thread: RE: XML Schema project
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread