[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
Stefan Haustein writes: > I agree that Miles' proposal could be put into a separate (sax > independent) package, in principle, but without putting it into > SAX2 core, parser vendors would not be forced to supply the parser > vendor file, so it would be useless... I don't want to force them to provide that, though -- SAX is already hard enough for implementors to get right without adding another hurdle. If there's as big a demand as you and Miles believe, then market pressure will convince implementors to include the configuration file anyway, and if not, then we've saved implementors some unnecessary work. One of the keys to SAX1's success was making life easy for implementors, even when it meant leaving out features that some users would have liked. All the best, David p.s. I prefer to talk about implementors rather than vendors, since not all parsers are maintained by commercial entities. -- David Megginson david@m... http://www.megginson.com/ *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|