[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The Power of Groves

  • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • To: xml-dev@x...
  • Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 19:06:42 +0000

Re: The Power of Groves
At 12:50 AM 2/11/00 -0600, Steve Schafer wrote:
>Where I'm coming from:
>
>Unlike Peter and probably most of the others participating in this
>discussion, I'm actually very comfortable discussing all of this in
>abstract terms. (Perhaps it's because I'm a physicist by training--I
>don't know.) And I do strongly feel that looking at the abstract
>picture is the way to understand precisely where any deficiencies may
>lie.

Excellent. We need more people like you! 

>We need to make this stuff accessbile, but first we need to make it
>work. I'm an experienced software developer; I've written parsers,
>interpreters, sophisticated text and graphics rendering engines, etc.
>Complex modeling and programming issues don't scare me. What scares me
>is the possibility that I'm going to embark on a major journey using
>groves as a fundamental data abstraction for a very large project, and
>then a year from now I'm going to hit a brick wall because of some
>unforeseen deficiency.

What we also need is a critical mass of people who believe enough to make
it happen - by writing systems that are abstract enough and generic enough
and useful enough that they self-replicate. Eliot tried very hard to
respond to this by writing Phyllis. I believe in Eliot's vision (and his
co-believers). But until there is a tool which solves a sufficient number
of my problems quickly, I will probably flounder along by writing ad hoc
solutions for each problem.

To take an example - I have written a set of Java classes to support a DOM
in CML. I was surprised how much effort it was. I found myself writing a
class for each element and an interface for each attribute. [Note, these
classes often have to do chemistry things, so *some* code has to be
written.] But I felt that there was a lot of coding that should have been
automatic from the DTD [I know that there are Beanmaker approaches to this
but they didn't quite seem to fit.] When Schemas are finalised I am sure we
shall need this sort of stuff routinely. At that time we need a fairly
small number of approaches so that we can make the investment to learn the
technology - like we have for SAX and DOM.

	P.


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.