[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article

• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:48:16 -0600

Ann Navarro wrote:
> 
> It doesn't. Become an invited expert. But you'll have to play by the rules,
> and since you've repeatedly said you won't.......not much anyone can do to
> help that.

Sure.  Play only by the rules that work to one's advantage.  This is the 
trend set by HTML and its developers when the web started.  Work to the 
advantage of the application and field it.  Choose very carefully the 
tech your app will interoperate with and ignore the rest.  If you need a 
copyrighted tech or the IP of a consortia or standards group, reverse 
engineer it, change the names, then put it out as a standard or open 
specification.  If that is an open group not interested in proprietary 
tech, go the SML route.  No problem.

They can help themselves anytime they choose. Some will.  There won't 
be a thing anyone can do about that.

len


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Alternatives to the W3C
• Next by Date: Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
• Previous by thread: RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Next by thread: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread