[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article

• From: =?windows-1252?Q?Aleksi_Niemel=E4?= <aleksi.niemela@c...>
• To: 'Ann Navarro' <ann@w...>, xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:05:56 +0100

> Become an invited expert. 

This is probably told somewhere else, but I'm still asking. How to become an
invited expert? Not that I'll be one ever... :)

        - Aleksi

-----Original Message-----
From: Ann Navarro [mailto:ann@w...]
Sent: den 17 januari 2000 19:33
To: Simon St.Laurent; xml-dev
Subject: RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article


At 01:08 PM 1/17/00 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:

>Book-writing isn't that lucrative a business, however much I may enjoy it.
>I don't see why that should keep me out of the W3C, however.

It doesn't. Become an invited expert. But you'll have to play by the rules,
and since you've repeatedly said you won't.......not much anyone can do to
help that. 

Ann
---
Just Released! - HTML BY Example
Now shipping -  Mastering XML 
Also in print:  Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials

Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education
http://www.hwg.org/services/classes





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN
981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer
to OASIS.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: tricky XHTML 1.0 namespace question
• Next by Date: Re: Costs of the W3C
• Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Next by thread: RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread