[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: WML vs. XHTML

• From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 17:36:23 -0500

Jeffrey E. Sussna wrote:

> >    <ACTION TYPE=ACCEPT TASK=GOSUB VARS=host=$(hostname)

> Any language that contains a construct called "GOSUB" deserves dustbin
> status. :-)

Indeed. Check out this little snip from Rohit Khare's "W* Effect Considered
Harmful":

	One way to think of WML is as programming 3270 screens
	with a very simple BASIC. An application is delivered to
	the handset as a 'deck', which allocates a corresponding
	pool of storage space for variables. Individual 'cards'
	are executed on entry and exit to render the handset
	screen: they can fill in (shared) variables, rerender on
	external event notifications (e.g. call completed), and
	bind further actions to a small set of buttons. The
	display calls themselves are essentially character-cell
	oriented, with tab alignment and bold, italic,
	underline, big, and small fonts. Tables, frames, colors,
	and so on are not supported. Semantic HTML markup like
	<ADDRESS> must be stripped out. Even simple declarative
	HTML doesn't mean what it used to -- <P> no longer
	begins a new line. 'Graphics' support is intended mainly
	for optional icons in place of text menus; no clickable
	menu maps or such.  WML is really a scripting language...

That's just the tip of the iceberg -- check out how they've "reinvented" TCP/IP:

	http://www.4k-associates.com/IEEE-L7-WAP-BIG.html


/Jelks


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WML vs. XHTML
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>

• References:
  • RE: WML vs. XHTML
    • From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>

• Prev by Date: RE: WML vs. XHTML
• Next by Date: Re: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Previous by thread: RE: WML vs. XHTML
• Next by thread: Re: WML vs. XHTML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread