[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Parser compliance

• From: Jerome McDonough <jmcdonou@l...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 09:17:37 -0500

At 09:18 PM 11/17/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>The DTD has two small but important roles in system implementation: as
>a partial set of structural validation rules and as a partial schema
>for guided authoring (it's nearly always supplemented in both cases).
>

Limiting a discussion of DTD's importance to system implementation, though,
strikes me as somewhat unfair.  Although perhaps not the case for many
commercial endeavors, DTDs provided a focus for many efforts designed
to provide a standard for document exchange.  If it weren't for DTDs, 
projects like EAD, TEI, and DDI would have had a much more difficult
time getting where they going as quickly as they did.  Granted the exact
mechanism didn't have to be DTDs, but DTDs did help a lot of people,
including me, start focusing on structure and really paying attention to
issues of document analysis in a way that I don't think would have happened
otherwise.


Jerome McDonough -- jmcdonou@l...  |  (......)
Library Systems Office, 386 Doe, U.C. Berkeley     |  \ *  * /
Berkeley, CA 94720-6000    (510) 642-5168          |  \  <>  /
"Well, it looks easy enough...."                   |   \ -- /  SGNORMPF!!!
         -- From the Famous Last Words file        |    ||||

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Parser compliance
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Parser compliance
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: Parser compliance
    • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
  • Re: Parser compliance
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why validate?
• Next by Date: Clarification on "Burnt by MSXML.DLL"
• Previous by thread: Re: Parser compliance
• Next by thread: Re: Parser compliance
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread