[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Parser benchmarks (WAS: Re: IBM xml4j parser vs. Datachannel)

• From: "Nik O" <niko@c...>
• To: "- XML-Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 12:43:44 -0600

The XML.COM article was "Summary of XML Parser Performance Testing" of 5 May
1999, at "http://www.xml.com/pub/Benchmark/exec.html".  Six parsers were
tested: two in C (expat and RXP); two in Java (Java XP and IBM's Java
XML4J); plus Perl and Python wrappers for expat.

Another (overlapping) article was "Benchmarking XML Parsers on Solaris" of 9
June 1999, at "http://www.awaretechnologies.com/XML/xmlbench/solaris.html".
This also looked at six parsers, dropping RXP, and testing another Java
parser (xml-tr2 from Javasoft).

-Nik O, Teton Data Systems, Jackson, Wyo.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: DOM serialization
• Next by Date: Re: Where to start?
• Previous by thread: Where to start?
• Next by thread: Parser benchmarks (me bad!)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread