[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: scripts and XHTML

• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@m...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 14:58:28 -0400

Simon St.Laurent  wrote:


>Continuing the explorations I was making last night, this time for a 'ways to
>abuse comments' section, I was working on a piece about the common use in HTML
>of comments around the contents of SCRIPT elements. (It hides the content from
>browsers that don't support scripts, basically.)

>...
>I'd guess the convention has come to the end of the line, but it's not really
>clear.  Thoughts?  Is the final final review period (after members have voted)
>over yet?


The convention is used for old browsers that don't understand <script>.  These
won't understand XHTML either, so (IMO) there's no real need for the <script>
convention in HTML.

Tom Passin



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: scripts and XHTML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Reconciling old versions of xml4j_2_0_5.jar parser with xml4j_1_1_6.jar parser
• Next by Date: XML Search Engine Holy War - Attributes vs. Elements
• Previous by thread: Re: scripts and XHTML
• Next by thread: Re: scripts and XHTML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread