[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

re: comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?

• From: "Dean Roddey" <droddey@c...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1999 19:02:55 -0700

>I'm trying to decide which XML C/C++ parser to use.  Is there any
comparison
>available?  In particular, comparison between IBM4C++ and expat.
>

In my own defense... :-) XML4C2 isn't *that* new by now. Yes, like any
complex software it has some bugs, but its coming along nicely and its quite
flexible as to where you use the 'out of the box' stuff or the 'roll your
own' stuff (and getting more so.)

As of the new release (2.3, which isn't on Alphaworks yet I don't think but
its on the way there), I think we are on about 10 platforms and compiler
combinations with more being done all the time.

--------------------------
Dean Roddey
The CIDLib Class Libraries
Charmed Quark Software
droddey@c...
http://www.charmedquark.com

"100% Substance Free. Less Content, more cost. Just the way you like it"


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?
    • From: "khaitan" <khaitan@t...>

• Prev by Date: re: illegal namespace usage
• Next by Date: Re: Application using XML Parser
• Previous by thread: Re: comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?
• Next by thread: Re: comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread