[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML trade off 1 - DTD vs XML Schema

• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 03:18:32 +0800

 From: John E. Simpson <simpson@p...>
 

>At 04:04 PM 07/17/1999 +0800, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> [very useful summary of DTDs, schemata, infoset...]
>>and anonymous content types.
>
>What's an "anonymous content type"?

In a little note "Richer Anonymous Content Types" 
 http://www.ascc.net/xml/en/utf-8/anonymous.html
I have suggested that there are other declared content
types apart from EMPTY and ANY that might be
useful for XML Schemas.   (The content typing is anonymous
in that it specify kinds of content models without
actually naming the element types. This might fit in
with XML document usage better than simple
"open" and "closed" content models.)

I suggest:
SINGLE 
PAIR
PAIRS 
SAME 
LEAF 
LEAVES 
UNIQUE
NONRECURSIVE

Rick Jelliffe


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Financial reference data DTD
• Next by Date: Re: PCDATA
• Previous by thread: Re: XML trade off 1 - DTD vs XML Schema
• Next by thread: RE: XML trade off 1 - DTD vs XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread