[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XML for forms

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 11:36:23 -0400 (EDT)

Gavin McKenzie writes:

 > But regulations and legal requirements around the presentation of
 > forms, which often constitute documents of record with all the
 > usual legal requirements, aren't going away anytime soon.

I agree -- it's a small (from an enterprise perspective) but useful
niche market: quite large enough to keep JetForm and a couple of
competitors busy (and wealthy) for a while, but too small to excite
the predatory instincts of the big players.  I expect, though, that
there will be relatively few *new* requirements based around the
layout of paper forms, so there is a solid ceiling on the market's
growth.

Given the relatively small number of players and the limited need for
interoperability in the looks-like-paper forms market, it's probably
not a good target for W3C standardization, though someone like OASIS
might want to take a stab at it.  Perhaps a better goal would be to
ensure that XSL is powerful enough to handle all of the layout
requirements for forms.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: XML for forms
    • From: Gavin McKenzie <gmckenzi@J...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML for forms
• Next by Date: RE: XML for forms
• Previous by thread: RE: XML for forms
• Next by thread: RE: XML for forms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread