[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Top-down or bottom-up?
From: David Megginson <david@m...> >As Paul Prescod has pointed out, however, in both cases the process is >really iterative: in a bottom-up approach, it's often useful to stop >and throw together a straw-man architecture to see if what we've done >so far makes sense together; in a top-down approach, it's often useful >to stop and throw together some proof-of-concept components, to see if >there will be any obvious implementation problems Good point. (In my book I point out that) Maler and el Anderloussi's method is top-down, then bottom up, with a little middle out. Theirs is the most well document formal methodology. Rick Jelliffe xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|