[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)

• From: "WorldNet" <csgallagher@w...>
• To: "XML List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 11:30:54 -0500

> >http://www.w3.org/XSL/Transform/1.0
> > 
> > Is someone going to put something retrievable there?
> 
> Why should something retrievable be put there? It functions just fine as
> a unique name without having to retrieve anything.

If someone could explain, I don't understand yet why a reference to such a
'namespace' would be useful, particularly if there is nothing there to
access other than the seemingly ephemeral reference itself.

-- Regards

Clinton Gallagher
NET cpio@m...
URL http://www.metromilwaukee.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Inline markup considered harmful?
• Next by Date: Re: Inline markup considered harmful?
• Previous by thread: Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Next by thread: RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread