[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Editors - Word 2000??

• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:14:20 +1000

On the subject of XML editors:
* FrameMaker+SGML is excellent, but a big job to set up for complete
structured editing.
* EditTime is a very fast editor that is pretty simple to set up, aimed
at programmers.
* I have not tried Epic, but Adept editor has nice data entry.

>Paul Prescod <paul@p...> writes:

>> No one advocates pretending that structure doesn't exist.

Not to be contrarian, but I would love an XML editor that hid structure
from me.

Just like a coloured map, it would be great if all inline elements were
associated
with a font or style, and that I could use the style menus to drill down
to the allowed
generic elements in context.

For some people, I think visual operation is stronger than conceptual
operation;
for markup languages it means that even though I may start editing a
document
using thoughts about the structure, when I become familiar with the
editor I may
be better switching over to using visual cues (and to using keyboard
rhythms).
My final goal  may be "insert a particular element", but my proximate
goal
shortcuts itself to "insert something that looks the same as other
instances of
that element".

Anyone who has used FrameMaker+SGML or some of the other structure-based
editors knows that when a content model has many choice items, scrolling
menus
are tedious. Furthermore, it is difficult to keep track of many choices
mentally
anyway.

So I think a good user interface for an editor would also allow specify
elements
by reverse tracing through the stylesheet: you know you want to insert
an element
that is rendered italic & bold by the current stylesheet, so you select
menu
Style>Italic>Bold>
and it would present you a choice of any element types in the current
context
whose stylesheet matches that description.

I wonder if this would involve less mental effort on entry-operators
especially
when there are content models with many choices: it reduces the number
of
names they have to recognise in order to make the desired choice,
potentially
to a single choice. Presumably the same HCI rule (maximum of seven
choices at any level) that operates on names would also operated on
styles, so there would also be a maximum of 7 style qualities at any
level that
the operator would have to look through.

On a similar vein, one good thing that having named content models in
XML Schemas is that they can allow hierarchical menus for selecting
elements.

Rick Jelliffe


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Editors - Word 2000??
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: WYSIWYG..??
• Next by Date: Using grammars to generate XML data
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Editors - Word 2000??
• Next by thread: Re: XML Editors - Word 2000??
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread