[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Nested DTDs

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 12:46:30 -0400

Paul Prescod wrote:

> XML ended up breaking too many other SGML rules for this to happen. The
> empty end tag syntax was the most serious example but there are others.

This is a myth. As http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-sgml-xml says:

# NET delimiters can be used only to close an empty element. In SGML
# without the Web SGML Adaptations Annex, the NET delimiter
# is declared as />. With this approach, XML is not allowing null
# end-tags and is allowing net-enabling start-tags only for elements
# with no end-tag.
#
# In SGML with the Web SGML Adaptations Annex, there
# is a separate NESTC (net-enabling start tag close) delimiter.
# This allows the XML <e/> syntax to be handled as a combination
# of a net-enabling start-tag <e/ and a null end-tag >.
# With this approach, XML is allowing a net-enabling start-tag only
# when immediately followed by a null end-tag.

In short, XML empty tags are proper SGML, including pre-1996 SGML,
with some side constraints eliminating non-XML flexibilities
like "<foo/bogus content>", which "nsgmls -xml" duly complains about.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Nested DTDs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Nested DTDs
    • From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
  • Re: Nested DTDs
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>
  • Re: Nested DTDs
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
  • Re: Nested DTDs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Nested DTDs
• Next by Date: Re: Top-down or bottom-up?
• Previous by thread: Re: Nested DTDs
• Next by thread: Re: Nested DTDs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread