[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [Question] Re: XLink: behavior must go!

• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 04:36:21 -0500

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> 
> At 06:05 PM 5/16/99 -0500, Paul Prescod wrote:
> >If a processor it sees <MYLINK ... BEHAVIOR="popup()"> how does the
> >processor know which of the many programming language "plugins" it should
> >be passed to?
> 
> Hmm.... I didn't think it'd work quite like that.

I'm trying to show the outer limits of what the current definition allows.


> I figured BEHAVIOR would be an ordinary attribute - say, "popup" instead of
> "popup()", which the style sheet or other app-specific gizmo then converts
> to "popup()" as appropriate, knowing what the context was supposed to be.
> Sort of like a selector for CSS Action Sheets, if they get off the ground.

You probably know this already but: you can use any attribute as a
selector. And if you use your own attribute name then you can namespace it
to avoid accidental name/semantic clashes.

-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

The dress code in Las Cruces New Mexico has been tightened [to] target 
Gothic clothing, such as dark trench coats. "It is not a witch hunt"
Superintendent Jesse L. Gozales said. "It is for the safety of the kids
in our schools."  - Associated Press, May 16 1999

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Question] Re: XLink: behavior must go!
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: XLink: behavior must go!
    • From: "Martin Bryan" <mtbryan@s...>
  • [Question] Re: XLink: behavior must go!
    • From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>
  • Re: [Question] Re: XLink: behavior must go!
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Problems validating the W3C schema DTD's
• Next by Date: Overall XML Schema "structure" impressions
• Previous by thread: Re: [Question] Re: XLink: behavior must go!
• Next by thread: Re: [Question] Re: XLink: behavior must go!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread