[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Namespace URI address resources

• From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
• To: 'XML Dev' <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 23:37:42 +0100 (BST)

On Mon, 31 May 1999, Paul Prescod wrote:

> Tim Bray wrote:
> > 
> > No, that's not a "formal logic" change, that's a huge basic semantic
> > change.  If the IETF had wanted to forbid people using these for
> > other purposes, they should say so.  
> 
> Okay, fine:
> 
> "A Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) is a compact string of characters for
> identifying an abstract or physical resource."
> 
> Normatively referenced RFC 2396: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2396.html
> 
> You can also read the section that begins "URI are characterized by the
> following definitions."
> 
> Paul's Fudamantal Law of URIs (PFLU): If a string does not identify a
> resource then it not a URI.

A string can be 'for' identifying an (abstract or physical) resource
without any URI-string to resource bindings currently being in effect.

<URI:urn:fictional:purl.org/net/danbri:pagesonmysiteaboutsociology> for
example, might be a URI whose purpose is to identify an abstract
resource which is a set of documents on my server about a specific
topic. This seems a reasonable use of an identifier. Seems odd to say
that the string stops being a URI for those periods when no documents 
fall into the appropriate category.

BTW this has all been much discussed on the WebDAV WG recently.
See archives at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/1999AprJun/
for details, in particular the BIND Proposal thread.

In general, I see no problem with a server managing a resource but (at
some point in time) there being no generally agreed binding from a URI
to that resource. At other points in time there might be several. The
would-be-indentifying string remains a URI regardless.


If...

> "A Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) is a compact string of characters for
> identifying an abstract or physical resource."

...read "string of characters _which_ identify an..." the situation
would be different. As things stand the definition is about intent, not
whether the URI does currently identify any resources.

Dan



--
Daniel.Brickley@b...                  
Institute for Learning and Research Technology http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
University of Bristol,  Bristol BS8 1TN, UK.   phone:+44(0)117-9287096


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Namespace URI address resources
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Namespace URI address resources
• Previous by thread: Namespace URI address resources
• Next by thread: Re: Just require URLs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread