[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Are PI targets arbitrary?

• From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:52:29 +0100

One way in which this differs from namespaces is that it does not provide a
mechanism to avoid name conflicts. A consistently applied encoding mechanism
for namespaces would have. That is, the ns-spec should well have premitted all
names to be qualified names. Since it precludes the name in a notation from
being qualified, it is not possible to use notation to this end. I have heard
the argument, that the association with a notation and the uri specification
for a notation obviates the need for qualification. It didn't understand the
claim. I still don't.

One really needs to an encoding of the form
<?pi fop:some-command some args ?>

which together with the binding < ... xmlns:fop="http://www.jtauber.com/fop/"
... >
would permit the application to operate with a token of the form
 ("http://www.jtauber.com/fop/" X "some-command")
and be assured that there are no name conflicts.

Yes, the present spec would permit this, but does not describe its effect.

James Tauber wrote:
> 
> I'm starting to put some options into FOP that are triggered by processing
> instructions. My initial thought was use 'fop' as the target.
> 
> But then it occurred to me: PI targets can be associated with a URI via a
> NOTATION declaration. This is *a lot* like namespaces. Does that mean PI
> targets should be arbitrary proxies?
> 
> Instead of looking for PIs with the target "fop" should I instead be looking
> for PIs with the target which is a NOTATION declared with URI
> http://www.jtauber.com/fop/
> After all, some other application might use the target "fop" but only mine
> would use the NOTATION with URI http://www.jtauber.com/fop/.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Are PI targets arbitrary?
    • From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Question on ANY (its use in RDF)
• Next by Date: Re: Question on ANY (its use in RDF)
• Previous by thread: Re: Are PI targets arbitrary?
• Next by thread: Translating XML -> HTML & RTF
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread