[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Reserved names and documentation

• From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• To: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 11:16:09 -0500

If this is indeed the case, as it appears to be, then namespaces have no
real meaning outside of the xxx: prefix. namespaces become nothing more (or
less :-) than a standard naming mechanism for tags. the namespace referenced
urn is nothing more than an arbitrary statement of who is supposed to own
the "xxx:" namespace prefix.

the only solution (if one is needed) is to reserve use of ':' in element
names and require conforming parsers to place elements in namespaces based
upon [namespace]:[tagname] which would break the behavior of most current
parsers. OTOH this would allow namespace prefix resolution to the specified
urn.

Jonathan Borden
http://jabr.ne.mediaone.net

>
>
> Andrew Layman wrote:
>
> > [I]f one wants to write a validatable document instance using
> > namespaces, one must use exactly the prefixes written in the DTD.
>
> And one must avoid exploiting local namespace scopes and default
> namespaces.
>
> --


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Reserved names and documentation
    • From: <david@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Reserved names and documentation
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces hate validation!
• Next by Date: RE: Namespaces hate validation!
• Previous by thread: Re: Reserved names and documentation
• Next by thread: RE: Reserved names and documentation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread