[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

xml and servlets

• From: mayes <dalvim@y...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@l...>, XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 05:27:07 -0800 (PST)

Has anyone done any kind of programming incorporating xml and
servlets. Also I would like all you experts out there to recommend a
book on xml..

Thanks

Mayes



---John Cowan <cowan@l...> wrote:
>
> Murray Maloney wrote:
> 
> > Thus validation depends on the existence of a namespace-aware
> > processor that can rewrite an XML document as an equivalent
> > document with all namespaces declared on the root element
> > and with no use of default namespaces or local scoping
> > of prefixes.
> > 
> > And, that processor is undefined and unimplemented.
> 
> I suppose eventually someone will have to MOV MOUTH, MONEY.
> But not me, not yet.
>  
> > Oh, by the way, what do you do about any entities you encounter?
> > I mean, when I combine an HTML DTD with a graveyard DTD,
> > how do I avoid name collision between general text entities?
> > 
> >         agrave, egrave, igrave, ograve, ugrave
> > 
> > Now I assume that you will tell me that there is a *simple*
> > algorithm for transforming the DTD and/or the instance to
> > deal with name collisions.
> 
> Now don't mix up two different issues!  There is *no* algorithm,
> and nobody claims there is, for merging DTDs automatically!
> Tim thinks one will eventually be found, about which *I* am
> deeply skeptical.
> 
> The claim being made here is:
> 
> 	Given:
> 
> 	1) a mixed-namespace DTD, and
> 	2) a mixed-namespace instance
> 		(which is WF and namespace-compliant)
> 		that purports to conform to it, and
> 	3) a source of information
> 		about the prefix-to-URI map(s) being used in the DTD,
> 
> 	it is possible by preprocessing
> 
> 	1) the DTD (without the instance, and
> 	2) the instance (without the DTD)
> 
> 	to produce a modified (DTD, instance) pair which will validate
> 		using an ordinary XML validator
> 
> 	if and only if
> 
> 	the original (DTD, instance) pair would validate
> 		using a (nonexistent) namespace-aware validator,
> 
> 	and the resulting modified instance
> 		will be namespace-equivalent to the original instance.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
> 	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
> 	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
> 		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
> 
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post,
mailto:xml-dev@i...
> Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
> To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
> (un)subscribe xml-dev
> To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following
message;
> subscribe xml-dev-digest
> List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml and servlets
    • From: David Brownell <db@E...>
  • Re: xml and servlets
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces hate validation!
• Next by Date: Re: Regulating the XML Marketplace
• Previous by thread: Just a doubt...
• Next by thread: Re: xml and servlets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread