[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Content v. attribute

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 10:47:01 -0500

Vrijland, Jacco TRC-OGRS/2 wrote:

> In this previous structure I have not
> yet incorporated a general description of the data (possibly quite a
> long string).

One good reason for modeling long descriptions as character data
rather than attribute values is to incorporate markup into it.
Descriptions are often the better for a bit of rich text: they
need things like emphasis and even hyperlinks.  For a DTD building
block that provides such things, see
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/XML/ibtwsh.dtd .

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Content v. attribute
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>

• References:
  • Content v. attribute
    • From: "Vrijland, Jacco TRC-OGRS/2" <Jacco.J.Vrijland@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Content v. attribute
• Next by Date: Re: Content v. attribute
• Previous by thread: Re: Content v. attribute
• Next by thread: Re: Content v. attribute
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread