[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Namespaces Revisited...
At 11:13 AM 9/14/98 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >Unfortunately, we're stuck with it, until some ISO/IEC committee >can be persuaded to take up XML (there is already one trying >to create ISO HTML). ISO/IEC WGs may be horribly slow and politics-ridden, >but they can't just *ignore* comments if they are properly submitted. >They *have* to process all of them. For what it's worth, the XML process has been *extremely* open to comments and considered, exhaustively and at great length, the issue of whether what we're trying to do with namespaces could be done better with architectural forms or some variation thereon. I and David Megginson and others have expanded at near-infinite length in this forum and others on these issues and the bases for the process' conclusions. I fully acknowledge that you disagree with the conclusion that the committee came to, but it is incorrect and damaging to allege that the process ignored the input. -Tim xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|