[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX: two alternatives for namespaces

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 09:55:02 -0400

David Megginson wrote:

>   What changes to SAX 1.0 are required to support two-part names?

Follows a summary of my views.

> 1. Concatentation
> 
>   Use a single Java String (or C++ wstring, etc.) to represent a
>   two-part name; select a non-XML character to use as the separator.

I strongly support this.

>   Advantages:
>   - requires no modification to SAX 1.0

Also: it can be layered on top of existing SAX-compliant parsers
as a filter, so that parsers need not change for namespace support.

>   Disadvantages:
>   - places additional burden on applications
>   - may produce unexpected results with applications that assume only
>     traditional one-part names (especially normalisers)

Adding namespace support in a filter makes avoiding these problems
easy: if namespace interpretation is a Bad Idea for your application,
don't install it.  It is applications, not parsers, that need or
don't need namespace information.

>   - makes equality testing tricky

I'm not sure I understand this.  Assuming that all relative URLs are
coerced to absolute form (which my current implementation regrettably
does not do), there seem to be no special issues.
 
> 2. New Interface

>   Advantages:
>   - provides easy and separate access to the URI part and the base
>     part of a name

Adding a few static routines to separate a combined string into its
components adds very little space cost, though admittedly some
runtime cost.

>   Disadvantages:
>   - backwards-incompatible with SAX 1.0; all software would have to
>     change

I think this is a very large cost indeed.
 
> Of course, we should finalise nothing until the namespaces spec
> becomes a recommendation.

Agreed, but experimental implementations are well worthwhile.
 
-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • SAX: two alternatives for namespaces
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX: parser features (was SAX: two alternatives for namespaces)
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces: prefixes vs. no prefixes
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX: two alternatives for namespaces
• Next by thread: New release of XML for Java: 1.0.4
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread