[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: John replies to Ron: Differences

• From: rbourret@d... (Ron Bourret)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 18:10:56 +0200

John Cowan writes:

> Ron Bourret writes:
>
> > To indicate a PCDATA-only element, I use a PCData element while John
> > uses an empty MIXED element. Although the PCData element is not
> > strictly necessary, I think the commonality of PCDATA-only content
> > makes it useful. 
> 
> I was thinking that PCDATA-only content is not so common.  Most of
> the time, textual elements contain fancy-text information like bold,
> italic, or whatever.  Pure plain text with no markup allowed probably
> makes the most sense in title elements and such.

Content models of PCDATA and EMPTY represent the terminals in DTDs.  That is, 
bold, italic, etc. have a PCDATA content model.  Furthermore, in more data (as 
opposed to document) applications of XML, PCDATA-only content seems to be 
relatively common.  For the moment, I have left PCData in and required Mixed to 
take at least one ElementRef, per your earlier suggestion.

-- Ron Bourret

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • XSchema: PCDATA-only content (was: John replies to Ron: ...)
    • From: Toby Speight <tms@a...>
  • Re: John replies to Ron: Differences
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces and PURLs
• Next by Date: XSchema: Notation attributes (was Re: XSchema: multiple proposals)
• Previous by thread: John replies to Ron: Differences
• Next by thread: Re: John replies to Ron: Differences
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread