[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Open Standards Processes

• From: matthew@p... (Matthew Gertner)
• To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 18:42:45 +0200

Agreed. When you get right down to it, the same probably goes for unfocused
rambling about inheritance, semantics, etc. (although personally I enjoy it
thoroughly). Anyone interested in setting up xml-pontification? :-)

Matthew

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent <SimonStL@c...>
To: Xml-Dev (E-mail) <xml-dev@i...>
Date: Friday, April 24, 1998 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: Open Standards Processes


>The W3C isn't always beautiful, but I think we'd better get back to XML
>discussion instead of W3C discussion before the list masters have to come
out
>and whack us with small sticks.  One of XML-Dev's best features is its
ability
>to stay focused on _XML_.
>
>Unfortunately, I don't know of any good forums for
>discussing/pondering/plotting against/praising the W3C.
>
>Simon St.Laurent
>Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Open Standards Processes
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML-DEVIL Proposal - was Open Standards Processes
• Next by Date: Re: Open Standards Processes
• Previous by thread: Re: Open Standards Processes
• Next by thread: Re: Open Standards Processes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread