[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Partial XML Processors (was Re: JavaScript parser update and Questio

• From: "Jeremie Miller" <jeremie@n...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 09:43:01 -0600

> [great discussion about well-formed parser and ignoring DTD stuff
completely]

I guess I'm not the only one who is unsure about this.  I would like to
think that based on the mentioned goal 4 of XML: "It shall be easy to write
programs which process XML documents" that the true spirit of _only_ a
well-formed parser is the requirements that it can process a well-formed
document(and the proper error reporting which I'm still working on).  Now
yes, *all* XML documents are well-formed, but the DTD stuff is extra
information for a validating parser.  If possible, it would be great for all
well-formed parsers to at least process internal DTD information, but that
is still an activity beyond well-formed XML documents.  Again, this is all
just my opinion, so if it needs changing please let me know :)

What this stems from is the fact that my JavaScript XML parser has no
_fundamental_ way of accessing URL's or files, and therefore no way of
obtaining _anything_ external to the XML string it was given.  So I am
trying to do the best I can with that.  The point I'm at is trying to figure
out if I need to actually process internal DTD information, for now I just
ignore it.  As it stands, my most immediate goal is simply to correctly
process XML fragments, since it is beyond the functionality of JavaScript to
be a full-blown XML parser for various reasons(encoding, file access,
etc...).

Would it be worthwhile writing up a *simple* document clearly identifying
all of the requirements for a well-formed parser and a validating parser,
such as "It has to be able to handle CDATA, rmd, DTD's, recognize entities,
and throw errors for X, X and X, etc..."?  Or am I the only one who doesn't
see _clearly_ the requirements and differences as defined in the XML spec?

Jer



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Partial XML Processors (was Re: JavaScript parser update and Questions)
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: AElfred and External Entities (was Re: Partial XML Processors) and Questions)
• Next by Date: Re: Partial XML Processors (was Re: JavaScript parser update and Questions)
• Previous by thread: Re: Partial XML Processors (was Re: JavaScript parser update and Questions)
• Next by thread: Re: Partial XML Processors (was Re: JavaScript parser update and Questions)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread