[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Empty AttlistDecl
Hi! Production [52] of the XML spec reads AttlistDecl ::= '<!ATTLIST' S Name AttDef* S? '>' A legal AttlistDecl would be <!ATTLIST> What's the purpose of an empty AttlistDecl? Shouldn't production [52] read instead as follows? AttlistDecl ::= '<!ATTLIST' S Name AttDef+ S? '>' (+ instead of *) Why was a "Possibly empty attribute definition list" (K.4.4.1, [142], ISO 8879 TC 2, http://www.sgmlsource.com/8879rev/n1955.htm) introduced in SGML with the latest revision? Thanks in advance for any answer! Bye, Stefan. +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Stefan Mintert UniDo: mintert@i... private: stefan@m... WWW: http://www.informatik.uni-dortmund.de/~sm/ +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "let the music keep our spirits high..." (Jackson Browne) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|