[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: IDL?

• From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 14:39:20

At 20:12 28/12/97 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>Peter Murray-Rust writes:
>
> > I appreciate that for those constructing parsers, the question of
> > where SAX-J sits w.r.t. DOM is important and possibly affects their
> > ease in implementing SAX-J. And, of course, we must make it easy
> > for parser writers, since if it isn't they won't play. From the
> > *user*'s point of view, the interior of SAX-J is irrelevant :-)
>
>Unfortunately, the question matters greatly for the _design_ of SAX-J:
>if SAX-J has to provide enough information to build a level-one DOM,
>it will have to deliver _all_ of the required information; if not,
>then it can be somewhat simpler.  (It is possible, of course, that
>changes to the DOM's information set will then require future changes
>to SAX-J, but changes to DOM terminology will not.)

I understand. I therefore don't cast a vote as I am not able to make
sufficiently valuable comments on the precise relationship of SAX-J to the
DOM. I hope that you are interacting offline with Tim and others and will
come up with a proposal that (at least that group) feels is workable. I
shall be more than happy with whatever comes out and will pledge that JUMBO
will interoperate with it. (JUMBO has been fighting AWT 1.02 and the
dreaded rhinovirus recently, but should manage).

	P.



Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: IDL?
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • RE: IDL?
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • RE: IDL?
    • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
  • RE: IDL?
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>
  • RE: IDL?
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>
  • RE: IDL?
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: IDL?
• Next by Date: RE: IDL?
• Previous by thread: RE: IDL?
• Next by thread: RE: IDL?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread