[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: MSXML is tied to Windows

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• To: "Joe Lapp" <jlapp@a...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 11:15:59 -0800

Joe,

Windows dependency of MSXML is minimal.  All you have to do is following:

1. remove com.ms.xml.dso package.

Delete the class files from the jar and/or comment it out of the makefile.
DSO is accessed by some of the samples but none of the other MSXML packages.

2. remove dependency on com.ms.xml.xmlstream package.

Latest version of MSXML includes an alternate XMLInputStream class located
inside the 'make' directory.  Replace com.ms.xml.util.XMLInputStream with
the alternate version to remove dependency on com.ms.xml.xmlstream package.

WIth above two changes, you will end up with a pure-Java version of MSXML.
MSXML is the most complete XML parser available right now and you get the
source code on top of it.  I would be smiling by now if I were you :-)

Don Park

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@a...>
To: xml-dev@i... <xml-dev@i...>
Date: Friday, November 14, 1997 11:02 AM
Subject: MSXML is tied to Windows


>I've been looking at Microsoft's MSXML.  Although it is written
>in Java, it is tied to the Windows platform.  Instead of using
>Java's URL facilities in java.net.*, it provides an ActiveX
>control to do the job.  Class com.ms.xml.util.XMLInputStream
>relies on COM interface IXMLStream, which MSXML provides as a
>DLL written in C++ (see com\ms\xml\XMLStream\XMLURLStream).
>
>I'm looking for a 100% pure Java XML parser that is being
>actively maintained.  I've got a few projects up my sleeve,
>and I want to be sure that the code I write is cross-platform.
>If I write to MSXML, I tie myself into Microsoft's API.  Given
>that the only implementation of that API works only on Windows,
>to write to MSXML would be to tie my Java tool to Windows.
>
>It seems that Microsoft has the most complete implementation
>of an XML parser, so Microsoft is doing a very good job of
>trying to get me to write Java that works only on Windows.
>--
>Joe Lapp (Java Apps Developer/Consultant)
>Unite for Java! - http://www.javalobby.org
>jlapp@a...
>
>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
>Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
>To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
>(un)subscribe xml-dev
>To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following
message;
>subscribe xml-dev-digest
>List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
>
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: MSXML is tied to Windows
    • From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@a...>

• Prev by Date: MSXML is tied to Windows
• Next by Date: RE: MSXML is tied to Windows
• Previous by thread: Re: <?XDEV?> and BEHAVIOR: a meta-proposal and a proposal
• Next by thread: Re: MSXML is tied to Windows
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread