[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Weak DTDs

• From: digitome@i... (Sean Mc Grath)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sat, 18 Oct 1997 09:48:39 +0100

>W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
>> Peter has run head-on into one of the fundamental problems with DTDs as
>> currently defined by SGML (and XML): we want them to describe *classes* of
>> documents when they actually describe *individual* documents (and are
>> incapable of defining classes of documents except in very weak ways).
>
SGML establishes a one-to-one relationship between markup and DTD.
The instance - directly or indirectly - *names* its DTD.

However, a given instance can be gainfully parsed w.r.t.
many DTDs to achieve different effects - weakening contraints is one of 
them.

To do this involves specifying at parse time - rather that at authoring time -
what DTD to use for the parse.

<Statement InvititationForTrouble=TRUE">
HyTime allows parsing w.r.t. a meta-DTD via HyTime aware parsers. However,
I think there are many occasions when there is nothing "meta" involved. Just
a desire to parse w.r.t to an alternative schema. Not a meta-schema - just
a different schema.
</Statement>


Sean Mc Grath

sean@d...
Digitome Electronic Publishing
http://www.digitome.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Weak DTDs
    • From: Peter Newcomb <peter@t...>
  • Re: Weak DTDs
    • From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Weak DTDs
• Next by Date: Electronic Product Catalogue Providers
• Previous by thread: Re: Weak DTDs
• Next by thread: Re: Weak DTDs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread