[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
Rick Jelliffe wrote: > Computer scientists in universities tend to produce small elegant languages > because that is all their modest budgets and limited problem domains allow. Now we're getting off topic, but that is completely incorrect. Computer scientists produce small languages because small languages present opportunities for reasoning, proof and analysis that are thwarted by large languages. SGML is the perfect example of a language that can be very difficult to prove things about because of (e.g.) minimization. You are correct that being clean from a computer science point of view is only one aspect of a language. SGML threw some of that away with minimization, but made major gains in usability. SGML's grove model is useful in that it unifies DTDs and documents at the "application level" without requiring an identical syntax. That is why it is unconvincing to claim that XML instance syntax for DTDs allows new forms of processing. At the application level, DTDs and instances have been "the same" for quite a while. All that is to be saved is a parser. It all comes back to reducing programmer effort -- which isn't unimportant but is also not the be-all and end-all. Paul Prescod xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|