[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SGML Tag Minimization

• From: Gerard Freriks <gfrer@l...>
• To: "hl7-mnm,List" <hl7-mnm@m...>
• Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 00:49:19 +0200

At 11:25 PM +0200 on 12-07-1997, Dolin,Robert H wrote:


> >One of the concerns raised with SGML as a message interchange format regards
> >the ratio of tags to content / the overall length of a message when encoded
> >in SGML. Considerable markup minimization is possible with SGML. The debate
> >over message length versus ease of parsing messages also has
>implications for
> >the use of XML, which I am less familiar with, but believe has less capacity
> >for markup minimization. Does anyone have further thoughts on the
> >requirements of message length?
> >

Problems?

As far as I follow the discussion in XML, I know that markup minimalisation
isn't a part of XML !

There is a standard using SGML in order to exchange finacial information.
They use the minimization, and supposedly are contemplating to conform to
the XML -standard.

At this moment there is possibly a debate starting at XML-DEV on this subject.

If we (HL7-SGML) think it should be included into XML, we must take action now.

My personal subjective opinion is that it should be included.

On the other hand XML is supposed to be a 'simple' version of SGML.
20% of the declarations and 80% of the functionality of SGML.
So adding this and adding that will be counterproductive with regards to
the design objective.

(I have no real life experience writing XML or SGML stuff. I'm a
contemplator, only)

GF

Gerard Freriks,huisarts, MD
C. Sterrenburgstr 54
3151JG Hoek van Holland
the Netherlands  		Telephone: (+31) (0)174-384296/ Fax: -386249
				Mobile   : (+31) (0)6-54792800
ARS LONGA, VITA BREVIS



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Why do XML and OFX have subtle differences?
• Next by Date: Re: Why do XML and OFX have subtle differences?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why do XML and OFX have subtle differences?
• Next by thread: character encoding questions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread