[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] #x3000 inconsistency in June XML Syntax spec?
One of the difference between the April and June specs was the removal of #x3000 from [1] S ::= (#x20 | #x9 | #xd |#xa)+ However, it still survives in [14] PubidChar ::= #x20 | #x9 | #xd |#xa | #x3000 | [a-zA-Z0-9] ... Should it be removed from [14] for consistency? xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|