[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML-LINK implementation

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Peter@u... (Peter Murray-Rust), xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 08:08:26 -0700

>2.1 **Default Attribute Values**.  This appears to be a parser requirement
>and I'd be grateful if Norbert and Tim (and any other parser writers) could 
>express their views.  At present all my test examples are based on explicit
>attributes in the document.  Parser development would be highly desirable.

Yes.  Lark (and I'm nearly certain NXP) both do default attributes now,
if declared in the internal subset, properly; so there's no need
for those explicit attributes.

>**General point**  XML-LINK applies to WF as well as valid documents.
There are
>many things that can produce apparently meaningless documents (e.g. linking
>from one WF|valid document to another WF|valid which might reasonably throw
>errors but the spec has not (yet) commented on these - I hope it will later.

Huh?  I don't understand this point at all. -Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: endless loops ?
• Next by Date: Re: various issues
• Previous by thread: XML-LINK implementation
• Next by thread: Re: XML-LINK implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread