[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Simple approaches to XML implementation
At 07:19 PM 01/03/97 +0100, F. Chahuneau - General Manager wrote: >All in all, you can see that some design decisions in XML were precisely >motivated by the desire to make an ESIS event stream sufficient to >implement an identity transformation, even with no access to DTD >information. This is, of course, totally consistent with the idea that DTDs >should not be systematically needed for processing XML fragments. Whereas I agree with the rest of Francois' contribution, this paragraph is not quite right. If you change "ESIS event stream" to "Instance character stream", then it would be more correct. But in fact the SGML->SGML declaration was not one of our goals; for example, the processor is not required to tell the app about [at least] comments and <![CDATA[ sections. The XML spec says *nothing* about the ESIS, merely, in a very abstract way, what the processor has to give the application. If either of these problems (the impossibility of SGML->SGML or the absence of an ESIS equivalent) is a big huge flaw in XML, there's still time to fix it. The SGML->SGML problem is probably a job for the XML WG. The ESIS issue is perhaps a job for this list. I personally think an API is better than an ESIS [even if the ESIS were properly defined] anyhow. Cheers, Tim Bray tbray@t... http://www.textuality.com/ +1-604-708-9592 xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|