[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Associating DSSSL style sheets with documents
At 10:57 AM 3/11/97 +0700, James Clark wrote: >At 12:24 10/03/97 EST, lee@s... wrote: >>Of course, it'd have to be >><?XML-STYLE ....?> >>for XML, no? > >Well, this is something that is applicable to SGML in general not just to >XML. Since <?xml-stylesheet is no more reserved than <?stylesheet in SGML, I >would rather use simply <?stylesheet for SGML. A general-purpose SGML >browser should probably make the keyword user configurable. This is interesting: Should an XML effort determine a PI that should be usable in general by SGML documents? I tend to think that the "authority" that invents/maintains the format of the PI should be identified, and "XML" sort of fits the bill, similarly to <?SO. We did say that the first name token in a PI functions as a sort of notation. It would be weird for an XML spec to specify <?stylesheet . I've also been beating the drum on the WG list about how our PIs should have "GIs" as well as "attribute specs," so I'd prefer to see <?XML stylesheet att1="val1" att2="val2"... ?>. This way, "<?XML" targets the PI so that it will be processed by an XML-aware processor, and the rest identifies the semantics of the instruction. Eve xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|