[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML API specification

• From: gtn@e... (Gavin Nicol)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 12:08:17 -0500

>>I think that for the *parser*, we should define an event-handling
>>interface, as it is much simpler to build certain applications
>>that way, and because you can build a tree from a stream of
>>events if you need to.
>
>yes.  Actually, it might be best to define an event interface (similar to
>SP?) first, and then define a grove interface.  In terms if
>test-implimentations, that means we could build an general event->grove
>module which could be used on any (conforming) event generating parser

Yes. It is also possible to validate the *parser* implementation based
soley upon the event-stream.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: XML API specification
    • From: Derek Denny-Brown <ddb@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML API specification
• Next by Date: Re: XML API specification
• Previous by thread: Re: XML API specification
• Next by thread: Re: XML API specification
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread