|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why XML for Messaging?
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:36:26AM -0700, Ken North wrote: > Rich Salz wrote: > > appreciated if you've lived through other bridges: > > com/corba > > That's the first answer that comes to mind. > > The COM versus CORBA debates produced a desire for a platform-neutral solution, > and we'd already seen the demonstrated interoperability of TCP/IP and HTTP. A story I sometimes tell... Suppose you work at a large bank, and are tasked with implementing Internet Banking. The main accounts database uses a database that runs on an IBM mainframe, so IBM's message queueing software comes to mind... the Web site uses a Sun Solaris system... and so you go to the COBOL and IBM Assembly teams and ask them to implement your CORBA IDL spec... they look at you blankly... so you take another tack and ask them for a report generator that puts pointy brackets around each field, and they smile happily and say "six weeks". :-) This oversimplification represents just part of why xml-rpc caught on so fast; I'll leave it to others to go further. It's about impedance matching. Liam -- Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








