|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] incompatible uses of XML Schema
I just got a call from a bespoke client (the XML guru in a large bank) asking whether I knew of any XML Schema refactoring tools. His problem is that one of their systems (from a big company) does not handle recursive elements. Another one of their systems (from another big company) does not handle substitution groups (or, at least, dynamic use of xsi:type.) Another of their systems (from a third big company) does not handle wildcards. (Some departments also used another tool that generated ambiguous schemas.) This is causing them a major headache: they are having to refactor 7,000 element schemas by hand to munge them into forms suited for each system. Their schema-centricism has basically stuffed up the ready interoperability they thought they were buying into with XML, on a practical level. This is obviously a trap: moving to a services-oriented architecture means that the providers can say "we provide XML with a schema" and the pointy-headed bosses can say "you service-user: this tool accepts XML with a schema so you must use that!" and the service-user has little recourse. Does anyone know of any XML Schema refactoring tools that can, say, replace substitution groups with explicit lists of elements in a schema? I am half thinking of developing a Topologi utility for this: any other requests in this area? Cheers Rick Jelliffe
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








