|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on
Michael Kay wrote: > Only, I think, by forcing the "arbitrary model" to implement some kind > of > standard interface like SAX or DOM - and that would defeat the whole > purpose, even if it were an improved SAX or an improved DOM. I agree with Michael. I also go so far as to say that the discussion is a bit misdirected: the apparently poor encapsulation of Source is more of a symptom of the fact that TrAX transformers (e.g., XSLT processors but potentially STX or XQuery or...?) need to be able to implement their underlying model however they so choose. Source is little more than a marker interface, and the thing that makes sense (at least to me) is to have off-the-beaten-path Source implementations (e.g., for a pull parser) exhibit enough polymorphism (implement SAXSource, DOMSource, etc.) to make them useful and reasonably portable for consumption by different Transformer implementations. -- Paul
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








