|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] XML Schema Question: named or anonymous types in element definition?
I appeal to the gods of XML, schemas, etc. to clarify an issue concerning XML Schema use... In the CAP (Common Alerting Protocol) specification[1], there are a number of element definitions that look something like the following: <element name = "msgType"> <simpleType name = "msgType" > <restriction base = "string"> ... </restriction> </simpleType> </element> I believe, perhaps incorrectly, that the "simpleType" element above should not have a name attribute. i.e. it should be simply: "<simpleType>..." I note that the .NET XSD editor simply rewrites such named types to anonymous types in the editor. Other schema editors complain about the name attributes, however, it is reported that the XSD tools that come with Axis require that the name attribute be present. What is the *correct* coding of this schema? Should the <simpleType> elements in this situation have name attributes? If not, then is it that they MUST not have them, or is it that they SHOULD or MAY not have them? (I can't find the spot in the XML Schema spec which would address this issue... bob wyman [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/5666/emergency-CAP-1 .0.pdf
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








