• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:46:28 -0400
• In-reply-to: <20030416202125.GP14888@s...>

jcowan@r... (John Cowan) writes:
>> Or perhaps customers would be wiser to simply learn to process WordML
>> and forget about the other features.  There's no risk of data loss
>> there, at least based on the current (scant) information.
>
>That would be fine if it were documented, but according to report it is 
>not.

Not well, perhaps, but it's hardly random.  I suspect it will keep a lot
of people in business for a long time, with or without documentation.



-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• Next by Date: Re: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
• Previous by thread: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• Next by thread: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread