• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:01:38 -0700
• Cc: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>, XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B7CAAE@R...>
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B7CAAE@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> ...  The authors seem to be accepting the transcience of URLs
 > [which the W3C TAG likes to pretend doesn't exist]

While we are on the subject of Koans, a question has been troubling me 
master: how can one string be more transient than another?

  Paul Prescod

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• References:
  • RE: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• Next by Date: Re: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
• Previous by thread: Re: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread