• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:46:26 +0000
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1025-7F503D9C704C11D794E90003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <20030416202125.GP14888@s...> <r01050400-1025-7F503D9C704C11D794E90003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> wrote:
| jcowan@r... (John Cowan) writes:

|>> There's no risk of data loss [from processing WordML], at least based 
|>> on the current (scant) information.
|>
|> That would be fine if it were documented, but according to report it is 
|> not.
| 
| Not well, perhaps, but it's hardly random.  I suspect it will keep a lot
| of people in business for a long time, with or without documentation.

Time to resurrect the Rainbow DTDs?

• References:
  • Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: FXSL library
• Next by Date: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
• Previous by thread: Re: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• Next by thread: RE: Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread